Skip to main content

Humans: Hunters or Gatherers?

There are those who advocate what is known as a paleolithic approach to the diet, which involves eating what cavemen may have eaten thousands of years ago: meat, nuts and relatively little vegetation or fruits.

The proponents of such a dietary approach argue that from 2.5 million years ago until the start of the Agricultural Revolution, or Neolithic Period, some 10,000 years ago, humans ate a largely animal-based diet. They argue that the human digestive system has not evolved to handle grain products, for example, to which they attribute a variety of modern ailments. We agree. But does this mean we're meant to digest meat?

Let us go back in time before the Paleolithic Era. Before then, we had no stone tools. The sharp canine teeth had been lost to our species by at least three and a half million years ago. So during the million of years up until the invention of weapons, we ate a great deal of uncooked plants. Like cattle, horses and other vegetarians, dating back 3.5 million years and moving up until the present day, we have molars for crushing food rather than knife-like incisors for cutting through flesh. Without the restriction of large canine teeth, our jaws are able to move somewhat side-to-side, making them ideally suited to crushing vegetation.
Canines are used to tear flesh.
Humans lack sharp canine teeth and instead have molars.
Molars are suited to chewing vegetation.
It is true that with the advent of stone tools about 2.5 million years ago, humans did become scavengers. Including animal flesh in the diet was (and is) not without its dangers, however. Humans cannot handle the fat and cholesterol of meat, which is the true cause of the variety of modern ailments and Western diseases on which the “Paleo” followers blame grains and processed sugars. On the other hand, it is impossible to give carnivores (dogs, for example) high cholesterol, even by feeding them great quantities of butter! Why? Because carnivores are suited to animal foods, taking what they need and eliminating the toxins and other harmful chemicals.

Some may imagine that early humans were full-time hunters who ate nothing but meat, but according to paleoanthropologist Dr. Richard Leakey, this is simply not the case. In a desperate search for calories, humans ate what they could find, and with tools to tear flesh, this did include animal flesh. But for a million years before the advent of stones, our diet was exclusively plants, and we should learn the lessons of history and understand the design of our digestive anatomy and continue in this ages-old practice. At least if the goal is optimal health.1

Please see: The Power of your Plate; Neal Barnard, M.D.; 1995.


Popular posts from this blog


I was watching the TV show Naked and Afraid last night as I sometimes do. The show teams together two strangers, a man and a woman, who attempt to survive on their own for a period of 21 days in some remote and isolated region. Some of the locales featured include the Australian Outback, the Amazonian rainforest and the African Savanna. The man may have a military background, or be an adventurist or deep sea fisherman. Sometimes he's an ordinary dude who lives with mom. The woman is a park ranger or extreme fitness enthusiast or "just a mom" herself. Sometimes the couple quarrel, sometimes one or both "tap out" (quit) in a fit of anger or illness. It is satisfying to see them actually make it through the challenge and reach their extraction point. The victors are usually exhausted, emaciated, begrimed and bare ass naked. 

Even more satisfying, at least for me, is the occasional ass shot, snuck in at strategic intervals to boost viewership, of course. It's co…


I hereby proclaim that June is meditation month. And July and August and some of September too. For me at least. During the hundred days that comprise summer, give or take, I have taken it upon myself to "assume the position" for approximately one hour each day, usually divided into two 30-minute sessions. During this time I sit in front of a candle flame, let my breathing subside, and with it my mental activity, and literally count the seconds.

The reductive tendency that is emblematic of science has penetrated schools of meditation, and there are many, each of which advertises its particular breed as, if not being the best, at least boasting novel or specific benefits not found in other forms of meditation. 

For example, there is mindfulness, which is the monitoring of thoughts. There is concentration or focus, as on an object or the breath. There is transcendental meditation, which uses the inward repetition of a phrase, or mantra, to "allow your active mind to easily …


To be spontaneous or systematic, that's the question. Or SOS, as the Police sing. Within me these two opposing characteristics are ever at war. I suppose we're all born more of the former. What child is not up for a trip to the candy store on a whim? But our educational system drums in the systematic approach to problem solving. You must progress from number 1 to 10 on your test. Each class is 50 minutes long. Etc. And indeed having a schedule and being methodical can lead to greater material success. If you only do what you feel like you may never study math, or organize your closet. But enslaving yourself to a ritual can suck all the fun out of life. To reconcile the two approaches we've evolved the weekend, which is basically a short vacation from the rigid workday, a time to play in an unstructured way. The athlete has his rest days, a time away from play. The family has the trip to the Bahamas. There are semester breaks in school, though having an entire summer off is…